Vote Climate Banner

Home     About     Current Elections     Past Elections     Campaign    Donate     Contact

2010 Tasmanian - Policy Comparison

To return to 2010 Tasmanian Election main page click here

Party key and links to websites:
Tasmanian Greens Policy Page
Tasmanian Liberals
"Team Bartlett - What we stand for" page. Note: currently lacking policy (14/1)
Socialist Alliance (Tasmanian)
Note: Links correct at time of original posting.

Last updated 14/3/2010

   Greens 
 Labor 
 Liberal 
 Socialist 
Acceptance
Accepts the science that the current climate change is largely human caused /
Policy
Separate climate policy
International
Supports the UN lead Kyoto Process
Recognition of international equity issues around climate change
Support for developing and poorer nations to tackle climate change
Goals*  Greens 
 Labor 
 Liberal 
 Socialist 
Carbon DiOxide Stabilisation Goals
300 ppm CO2 or below
Interim target of 350 ppm CO2
Zero Emission Goals
Net negative emissions
Near zero emissions
Zero net emissions
2020 Goals
Zero or negative emissions by 2020
80% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions below 1990 levels by 2020
60% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions below 1990 levels by 2020
40% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions below 1990 levels by 2020
20% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions below 1990 levels by 2020
5% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions below 1990 levels by 2020
5% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions below 2000 levels by 2020
2050 Goals
-25% or more reduction of greenhouse gas emissions below 1990 levels by 2050
Negative emissions by 2050
Near zero emissions by 2050
Net zero emissions by 2050
80% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions below 1990 levels by 2050
60% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions below 1990 levels by 2050
Emission reduction mechanisms  Greens 
 Labor 
 Liberal 
 Socialist 
Government designed mandatory reductions
Carbon tax
Carbon trading /
Energy  Greens 
 Labor 
 Liberal 
 Socialist 
Support crash conversion to renewable based electricity system
Support major role out of renewables
Support minor role out of renewables
Significant support for small small scale renewables
Oppose "clean coal carbon capture and storage"
Remove fossil fuel subsidies
Oppose nuclear power plants
Oppose naive forests to biomass power plants
Energy efficiency / reduction
Plan to limit energy growth
Plan to promote energy efficiency
Transport  Greens 
 Labor 
 Liberal 
 Socialist 
Near zero emission transport policy
Major improvements in public transport
Minor improvements in public transport
Support high speed rail Link between major cities
Significant improvements in cycling and walking infrastructure
Significant decrease in road spending
Upgrading and expand rail freight
Support of electric and plug in hybrid vehicles
Supports low emissions car industry
Identifies need to act on issues of oil peak
Opposes coal to oil and other GHG intensive fuels
Opposes conversion of food to fuel
Land clearing and forestry  Greens 
 Labor 
 Liberal 
 Socialist 
End to land clearing or greenhouse intensification of land use
End to logging of old growth forests
End to logging of native forests (1)
Including land clearing and forestry emissions in carbon tax/trading systems
Agriculture
Policy to reduce emissions from agriculture
Acknowledgement of the key role livestock and consequently meat and dairy consumption have on emissions
Including agricultural emissions in carbon tax/trading systems
Social Justice / Equity  Greens 
 Labor 
 Liberal 
 Socialist 
Social justice elements in plans to address climate change
Social equity elements such as global carbon rationing
Accepting regional climate refugees
Population
Plans to reduce or stabilise population growth

Notes:

1. The Greens state they would protect all high conservation value old growth forest. Given the poor state of almost all remaining ecosystems this means all native forest would be protected, and thus is the only reason they would get a tick here.

Key:
= Especially good policy or goes beyond stated goal.
= Supports
= Does not support or no evidence of support.
= Policy position has negative outcomes that deserve highlighting.
= Policy has very negative outcomes or moves us backwards.
= Yet to be assessed.
* = if goals listed in policy are given in a range, for example 60-80% reduction on 1990, the lower figure is used as the reference point.

Return to 2009 Australia Federal By-election main page

Your Vote will determine the future you live in.